Archive for October, 2008

US EXPATRIATES AND IRS TAX COMPLIANCE

Wednesday, October 29th, 2008

The international Firms of the Leading Edge Alliance gathered in Boston to debate the latest tax and accounting updates on their respective jurisdictions.

Mike Farra an international tax partner at Morrison, Brown, Argiz & Farra LLP , made a very good presentation on the tax position for US citizens and green card holders living and working abroad.

Mike and I spoke during lunch about the IRS voluntary disclosure program and how may US expats are not aware of the fact that they need to file a US Return, even if they have not been US residents for many years. I took good notes to advice anyone on that situation living in Spain.

The concept of citizenship, and less even the concept of a residence card holder, as the only element to determine a worldwide liability for income tax purposes is alien to most jurisdictions. The closer concept to citizenship in other jurisdictions are those of nationality, or the English based tax domicile, which mainly applies to Inheritance Tax and somehow to the resident non domiciled by exclusion.

In most jurisdictions, outside the US, it is the concept of residence what determines the liability to income tax for worldwide income. Therefore, it is not uncommon that tax advisers neglect this aspect when looking at US expats tax affairs in their new country of residence.

Having considered the above, and as a good friend of mine says, quoting his mentor, the only certain thing about reality is that if you do not face it, reality will face you. This is what US citizens and green card holders living outside the US may find, if they do not come to terms with the IRS.

The IRS requires all US Citizens and green card holders, independently on where they are tax residents, to file a US tax return and to report their worldwide income to the IRS. If a US expatriate has not filed his tax returns, I understand that the IRS Voluntary disclosure program provides a reasonable vehicle to regularize the situation.

GIBRALTAR, A NOT SO WELL KNOWN TERRITORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Monday, October 20th, 2008

Why do many international professional advisers, including the Big Accounting Firms, consider Gibraltar as a very unique jurisdiction in the European Union?

Beyond its well established position in the ranking of international financial centers, the tax situation places Gibraltar as an excellent base for international holding companies.

Over the years Gibraltar has positioned itself as a great place to do business internationally and all the European Union Financial and Tax Directives are applicable.

Anti Money Laundering provisions and Know Your Client protocols in Gibraltar are applied with strict adherence to EU and OECD protocols (27/02/2002)

What not so many advisers know is that Gibraltar, under Article 227(4) of the EEC Treaty is within the European Union by virtue of being a United Kingdom territory. In this respect, Article 28 of the 1971 UK Accession Treaty relieves Gibraltar from the common customs tariff, the common agricultural policy and the harmonization of turnover taxes, in particular VAT.

The UK and Spain have traditionally maintained a sort of “stand by” position regarding the issue of Gibraltar been an independent nation. What is clear at this stage is that conversations between the two countries now include Gibraltar, in what is known as the Tripartite agreement signed in Cordoba in 2004.

What is clear to many of us is that Gibraltar is a robust jurisdiction with a well deserved place in the European and International market place. It would be advisable that during this XXI Century the issue of decolonization and independence from the United Kingdom and Spain could be finally resolved under the auspices of the United Nations

WHICH INTERNATIONAL COURT COULD PREVENT THE END OF THE WORLD?

Saturday, October 4th, 2008

Although this is not a tax matter I found it interesting to introduce the Conflicts of Laws blog, a portal for those interested in the Conflict of Laws or Private International Law. A must to read for all of us involved in international law and taxes.

The question of this posting arose in relation to the recent experiment with the Large Hadron Collider, the famous giant particle accelerator operating on the Swiss-French border near Geneva.

The plaintiff, an American retired radiation safety officer and a Spanish science writer decided to initiate proceedings in Hawaii to stop the running of fear that the Collider might create a black hole which would spell the end of the Earth. They decided to file in the Hawaii District Court and the defendants were the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN), the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. National Science Foundation and the U.S. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab).

The Conflict of Laws blog posed the question “Which court has jurisdiction to prevent the end of the world? Any, one would think: after all, the end of the world is likely to have serious consequences pretty much everywhere.”

The Conflict of Laws blog continues

“…In an interview to the New York Times, one of the plaintiffs revealed that his strategy focused on American parties. He did not know whether CERN would show up, but he had added it as a party to save expenses. In any case, part of the project was funded by the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, and the magnets of the Collider are supplied and maintained by Fermilab.

The complaint argued that the defendants had failed to comply with American legislation, namely the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and also with the European precautionary principle.

As the New York Times reported, on September 26, 2008, the Hawaï District Court declined jurisdiction.

The order of the Court, which can be found here, is disappointing from a conflict’s perspective. This is because Judge Gillmor was able to dismiss the action solely on domestic grounds. In other words, she held that the court lacked jurisdiction within the American legal system, as a federal court, which is not to say that an American state court would have lacked jurisdiction….”

A good reading for a reflective weekend.

Copyright © 2008-2010, León Fernando del Canto - Legal Notices - Contact Us. All Rights Reserved.Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

International Tax Law Barrister, Lawyer, Abrogado & Attorney, Leon Fernando del Canto of Konsilia, offering services relating to international tax planning, tax advice, private clients, international law, serving Spain, United Kingdom, Europe.

Tax Precision is the trading name of León Fernando del Canto Gonzalez, a Barrister regulated by the General Council of the Bar in England and the Colegio de Abogados de Jerez de la Frontera.