<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tax Precision &#124; International Tax Forum &#187; Intellectual Property Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxprecision.com/category/intellectual-property-tax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxprecision.com</link>
	<description>The International Tax Forum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jurisdiction for domain names</title>
		<link>http://www.taxprecision.com/2011/08/articles/miscellaneous/jurusdiction-for-domain-names</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxprecision.com/2011/08/articles/miscellaneous/jurusdiction-for-domain-names#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>León Fernando Del Canto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Direct Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxprecision.com/2011/08/articles/miscellaneous/jurusdiction-for-domain-names</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Conflicts of Law Net I got this interesting case discussing the jurisdiction applicable to a domain name dispute. What are the potential tax consequences of this case? If a domain name jurisdiction is that of its registration, may we infer that a tax presence could be deemed too? The legal reasoning of this case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxprecision.com/2011/08/articles/miscellaneous/jurusdiction-for-domain-names/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP ESCROW AND INTERNATIONAL TAX PLANNING</title>
		<link>http://www.taxprecision.com/2009/01/articles/domicile/ip-escrow-and-international-tax-planning</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxprecision.com/2009/01/articles/domicile/ip-escrow-and-international-tax-planning#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>León Fernando Del Canto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domicile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.konsilia.es/blog/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Branded By Blog posted Software Database and Website escrow- do businesses really need it?. In the article, UK solicitor Izaz Ali outlines the importance of using escrow as a protection for electronic IP as well as a sound business development tool. Izaz mentioned in his article that ¨Escrow comes in to play when two parties [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxprecision.com/2009/01/articles/domicile/ip-escrow-and-international-tax-planning/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.taxprecision.com/category/intellectual-property-tax/feed ) in 1.27595 seconds, on Feb 5th, 2012 at 2:44 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 5th, 2012 at 3:44 am UTC -->
